The Barind Medical College Journal  is deeply committed to upholding the highest ethical standards in its publication process. The integrity of the research and its dissemination through peer-reviewed journals is a cornerstone of the scientific process. BMCJ follows the guidelines established by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) to ensure ethical integrity and expects all stakeholders—authors, reviewers, editors, and publishers—to adhere to these standards.

 

For Authors

The Barind Medical College Journal provides medical professionals, researchers, and scholars a platform to share their work with a global audience. Authors are expected to follow rigorous standards of ethical conduct and academic integrity throughout the submission and publication process.

 

1. Manuscript Submission Guidelines

• Original Work: Manuscripts must be original and not under consideration or published in another journal. Plagiarism, including self-plagiarism, is strictly prohibited.
• Manuscript Structure: Submissions should include an abstract (up to 250 words), keywords, and sections like Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion, and Conclusion. All references must follow a recognized citation format like the Vancouver style.
• Figures and Tables Should be precise, appropriately labeled, and cited in the text. They should add value to the manuscript and not duplicate content.
• Language and Style: Manuscripts must be written in clear, concise English. Authors may use professional language editing services, if necessary, before submission.

 

2. Authorship and Contributions

• Criteria for Authorship: Only individuals who contributed significantly to the research should be listed as authors. All authors must approve the final manuscript before submission.
• Acknowledgments: The acknowledgments section should mention contributors who do not meet the authorship criteria.

 

3. Ethical Compliance

• Human and Animal Subjects: Research involving human or animal subjects must have ethical approval from an institutional review board (IRB) or ethics committee. Authors should include a statement confirming compliance with ethical standards and informed consent from participants.
• Conflict of Interest: Authors must disclose any financial, personal, or professional conflicts of interest that may influence the research. Funding sources must also be acknowledged.
• Data Sharing and Transparency: Authors should be willing to share their data if requested for validation and transparency. Data-sharing statements should be included where relevant.

 

4. Review Process

• All submitted manuscripts undergo a double-blind peer review. Authors will receive feedback from expert reviewers, and revisions may be requested. The final decision for publication rests with the editorial board.

 

5. Post-Acceptance

• Once accepted, authors will receive proofs for review. It is their responsibility to ensure that no significant errors remain. Articles will be published under an open-access model, allowing free access to readers.

 

For Reviewers

Reviewers are critical to the Barind Medical College Journal's commitment to publishing high-quality, peer-reviewed medical research. As a reviewer, you are tasked with ensuring the integrity, relevance, and scientific validity of the work being considered for publication.

 

1. Confidentiality

• Manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Reviewers must not disclose any information about the manuscript to anyone outside the review process.

 

2. Objectivity and Fairness

• Reviewers are expected to provide objective and constructive feedback. Personal criticism of the authors is inappropriate. The aim should be to help the authors improve their manuscript.

 

3. Review Criteria

• Reviewers should evaluate the manuscript on several key factors:
• Originality: Does the manuscript present new and significant findings?
• Scientific Rigor: Are the methods sound and properly executed?
• Relevance: Is the research relevant to the journal's scope and readers?
• Presentation: Is the manuscript clearly written and logically organized? Are the figures and tables useful and clear?

4. Timeliness

• Timely reviews are critical to the publication process. Reviewers should aim to complete their evaluations within the designated time frame. If more time is required or a reviewer feels unqualified to review a manuscript, they should inform the editor promptly.

 

5. Ethical Considerations

• Reviewers should be alert to ethical issues such as plagiarism, conflicts of interest, or falsified data. If any such issues arise, they should be reported to the editor.

 

6. Conflict of Interest

• If a reviewer has a conflict of interest—whether personal, financial, or professional—they should decline to review the manuscript and notify the editor.

 

For Publishers

we are committed to ensuring the journal's integrity, quality, and ethical standards in all aspects of the publishing process.

 

1. Editorial Independence

• The publisher ensures that editorial decisions are made independently, based on academic merit, scientific rigor, and relevance to the journal's focus. Editorial independence is fundamental to maintaining the credibility of the journal.

 

2. Ethical Oversight

• In collaboration with the editorial board, the publisher upholds ethical standards throughout the publishing process. We are committed to addressing any cases of scientific misconduct, plagiarism, or publication malpractice in accordance with the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines.

 

3. Open Access Policy

• BMCJ operates under an open-access model, making all published content freely available to readers. This model promotes the wide dissemination of research findings and facilitates greater access to medical knowledge worldwide. The journal does not charge submission or publication fees to authors, ensuring that financial barriers do not impede the sharing of important research.

 

4. Indexing and Archiving

• The publisher is responsible for ensuring that all published content is archived and indexed in relevant academic databases, ensuring long-term preservation and accessibility. BMCJ aims to be indexed in major academic databases to increase the journal's visibility and impact.

 

5. Handling of Misconduct

• In cases of suspected ethical violations, such as plagiarism or data falsification, the publisher is responsible for investigating and taking appropriate action, including issuing corrections, retractions, or notifications to relevant institutions. The publisher will act swiftly and transparently in such cases.

 

6. Collaboration with Authors and Reviewers

• The publisher works closely with authors and reviewers to ensure a smooth publication process. This includes supporting the peer-review process, managing communications, and providing resources and guidance to authors regarding manuscript preparation and submission.